Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?

If  how to reduce emf 've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

They are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause issues for users.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices.  how to reduce emf  are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it.

While it sounds like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther far from antennas.

But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin serves as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
Helpful resources  are based on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.